Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Diversitas perspectiv. psicol ; 17(1): 162-177, Jan.-June 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1375317

ABSTRACT

Resumen El mercado laboral requiere de futuros trabajadores con buen desarrollo de competencias transversales como la Comunicación Oral y Escrita para el trabajo. Relacionado con esto, la categoría de auto-eficacia es relevante, pues constituye un factor decisivo para que un individuo logre sus metas, siendo entonces necesario evaluarla para dicha competencia en futuros egresados. Con este fin se diseñó, validó y evaluó la confiabilidad de una escala (n=443). Para la de validez de contenido se utilizó el método CVI y para la consistencia interna el método de división por mitades así como el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Finalmente se aplicó un análisis factorial para la validez de constructo. Se obtuvieron niveles altos de CVI (0.87) y consistencia interna (R=0.97, α=0.95) así como cuatro factores que explican el 66 % de la varianza total. Concluyendo que el instrumento es válido y confiable para medir auto-eficacia para la comunicación oral y escrita en entornos laborales en futuros egresados.


Abstract The labor market needs future workers with adequate levels of transversal skills such as Oral and Written Communication for the job. In this regard, the category of self-efficacy becomes relevant, since it constitutes a decisive factor for an individual to achieve his goals, being then necessary to evaluate this competence in future graduates. To this end, a scale was designed, validated and evaluated for reliability (n=443). For content validity the CVI method was used and for internal consistency the method of division by halves was used as well as Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Finally, a factor analysis was applied for construct validity. High levels of CVI (0.87) and internal consistency (R=0.97, α=0.95) were obtained, as well as four factors that explain 66% of the total variance. We conclude that the instrument is valid and reliable to measure self-efficacy for oral and written communication in work environments in future graduates.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL